Scrotes bash a single mum for trying to protect her teen daughters

It actually becomes about exactly that with this stance. And that is literally a big part of why men babytrap women. To prevent them from finding love. To prevent them from being happy. Just because you say it is not about that does not make it not about that. It is a fact. A direct consequence.

Closing your eyes and ears and humming doesn't change the reality of this insane demand.

Protect your children by protecting your children. Not by becoming a lunatic recluse and giving yourself up.

The whole stance is a logical fallacy. You draw an arbitrary line at : dating after you had children.

Yet, you could protect them even BETTER by:

- Not having them in the first place

Or by:

- using sperma donors exclusively

-> Ask all the people who got assaulted by their fathers.

But you do not draw the line there. And you know why? Because you still want to get to date and have children on your terms. Egoism. As long as it doesn't affect you it is fine. You draw the line exactly there, where you are not affected.

There is no law that says just because someone has 2X chromosomes that they have to be preoccupied with children like some pathetic lunatic. Granted some women make their child obsession the only content of their personality. There is no evidence of better outcomes in children with obessive anxious parenting. There is actually evidence of smaller Hypothalamus in children subjected to such tendencies.

And just because a rapist impregnated a woman doesn't make the rapists child safety a priority over the womans life. Good luck with that stance and that bold mouth if that actually happens to you.