.png)
However, you are also not obligated/entitled to have as you put it: "a very attractive" girlfriend.
Every girl comes with a price, and more often than not- you get what you pay for.
Side note: the very first comment is verbatim: "dump her, king!" And with these dumbass posts/comments, Reddit scrotes will always be out here wondering why they are dying alone in masses whilst death gripping their blistered dicks.
If he so worried about money, he needs to be single. They always wanna take from women, but God forbid she asks of him things that actually benefit her. She needs to dump him.
If this was reversed and the man needed the money, the woman would have picked up a second job plus some other side hustle to make it work, without asking anybody else for advice/opinions.
Even if he was going to be purely calculating, this woman is a good investment. If he supports and marries her, she’ll bring a lot of money to the marriage once she’s qualified.
The responses are men telling on themselves as to why we don’t build a man; they assume that once qualified she’ll dump him and aim higher. They’re projecting because that’s what they do.
One of my boyfriend's friends who isn't even that HV regularly sends money to his gf who is currently studying for her Master's in a different city. He lives fairly frugally himself, that's why he can afford those things. If he wanted to, he would. If even "average value guys" can do this, there's no reason OP can't except that he doesn't want to.
If you were a medical student who needs to learn a lot before getting to earn a lot of money, then it doesn't take two brain cells to know that it takes efforts to support a future doctor by any means he can. Heck I have seen people raise community funds to raise one doctor kid amongst their group. What isolated worlds do these men come from? Takes special kind of stupid to be working your brains for this way of thinking.
He “occasionally buys her stuff she really needs” and takes her on one date every two weeks - odds are he bought condoms a few times, maybe an emergency box of tampons, and takes her to a cheap meal twice a month. “Fiscally conservative” does not have to be the same thing as stingy and selfish. I hope she dumps him and finds a man who is happy to treat her generously and provide for her.
"Every girl comes with a price and you get what you pay for".
Excuse me?
Are we prostitutes now?
This is libfem thinking
Trading "good looks" (or anything else that's good about you) for money is the opposite of male generosity (which should be unconditional).. It's an economic transaction based on patriarchal dynamics. Is this even still a feminist website?
Edit: the sheer amount of downvotes on this comment with no further arguments, plus the replying comment calling "pickmes" women who don't perform femininity, indeed makes me think that this isn't a feminist space anymore. It's slowly becoming a space where women talk about how cool it is to get all dolled up so a man can pay for their education in exchange for the hours they put into make up. Nothing of which looks like high value or feminist to me. I'm getting more and more disappointed by this space by the day.
I think it's a bit odd to be sending part of your paycheck to someone that you have been only dating for three months and I say this as a woman who's fiance pays for all the major expenses. I do think though he should be doing things even when they are apart to make her life easier like ordering her uber eats or grocery deliveries paying for a cleaning service or covering a bill or two so she can focus on her studies. For me it's less about a dollar amount and more of what is my partner doing to add to my life and make my life more comfortable. I feel like anyone can send money I want thought behind it.