Males tell us all the time that basically they'd rape and murder us whenever they wanted to if there weren't laws against it, and even then, many men still won't control their base nature. The elites made the patriarchy for males so that they'd be easier to control. They knew males would have no problem being slaves as long as they had a wife and kids to abuse. Hence, a man's home is his castle. Single men are very dangerous, and we're about to find out how dangerous they really are thanks to our idiotic, treasonous politicians who've allowed an invasion of fighting aged males thru our southern borders.
I agree. Men between - say - 16 and 60 should stay in their home countries and work on making them a better and safer place for their families instead of fleeing like cowards.
Imagine running and crying that your home country isn't safe to stay in but leaving your elderly mother, disabled grandpa or underage siblings there to rot instead of staying to protect them or making sure they get to safety first.
This reminds me of in that Previn Karian video on misogyny, when he said something about how men made the incest laws because they knew men were savages and they needed to keep them under control to have a civilised and functioning society. I think men are angry that other men control them. Kind of similar to a father-son relationship, old men vs young men etc
I had an argument on Reddit with a scrote who said something along those lines too. I told him that the social order that restrains men from raping and murdering women is the same social order holding women accountable would they murder, poison and castrate men in their sleep. Since men are also made of flesh and blood, and therefore aren't invincible, it's fair to say that the women are respecting their part of the deal quite well by abiding to the law and not using sharp items, or dubious substances, on men.
The counterpart for men respecting the law and not raping and murdering women isn't absolute female submission, it's women not murdering, castrating, and poisoning men.
They constantly say "women only have rights because men allowed it to happen." as an argument that men are somehow virtuous for literally giving us the bare minimum. The reason that even happened wasn't because the fellas at the top decided to be kind that day. Instead it was to reduce the price of labor by 50%, because when women also started working the wages didn't stay the same as before. If enslaving us again would give them a similar benefit, they would do it in heartbeat. We're literally just tools for men, and science even proves that.
Well, the british suffregettes definetly resorted to terrorism to make themselves heard. And it worked. Second-wave feminists did the same as well. The reason these aspects of feminism are erased or at least not talked about, is because they hurt the male ego.
Edited
Unknown member
Oct 24, 2023
Replying to
We allowed them to be BORN.
Unknown member
Oct 24, 2023
Replying to
We've often been paid to work historically, with unmarried, working women leading incredibly fulfilling lives.
I think they even used to just hang rapists in some cultures.
.png)
Males tell us all the time that basically they'd rape and murder us whenever they wanted to if there weren't laws against it, and even then, many men still won't control their base nature. The elites made the patriarchy for males so that they'd be easier to control. They knew males would have no problem being slaves as long as they had a wife and kids to abuse. Hence, a man's home is his castle. Single men are very dangerous, and we're about to find out how dangerous they really are thanks to our idiotic, treasonous politicians who've allowed an invasion of fighting aged males thru our southern borders.
This reminds me of in that Previn Karian video on misogyny, when he said something about how men made the incest laws because they knew men were savages and they needed to keep them under control to have a civilised and functioning society. I think men are angry that other men control them. Kind of similar to a father-son relationship, old men vs young men etc
I had an argument on Reddit with a scrote who said something along those lines too. I told him that the social order that restrains men from raping and murdering women is the same social order holding women accountable would they murder, poison and castrate men in their sleep. Since men are also made of flesh and blood, and therefore aren't invincible, it's fair to say that the women are respecting their part of the deal quite well by abiding to the law and not using sharp items, or dubious substances, on men.
The counterpart for men respecting the law and not raping and murdering women isn't absolute female submission, it's women not murdering, castrating, and poisoning men.
Men tell on themselves all the time and still play victim.
They constantly say "women only have rights because men allowed it to happen." as an argument that men are somehow virtuous for literally giving us the bare minimum. The reason that even happened wasn't because the fellas at the top decided to be kind that day. Instead it was to reduce the price of labor by 50%, because when women also started working the wages didn't stay the same as before. If enslaving us again would give them a similar benefit, they would do it in heartbeat. We're literally just tools for men, and science even proves that.