.png)
Men are consumers, destroyers, parasites, and invasive.
Men’s gametes are contaminated and defective by default.
Yes, all men.
It is ingrained in their biology.
Men were never meant to love anything. Men hate themselves and spread their hate towards women and everything around them. They were never meant to exist.
Men like feeling wanted and needed by women because men don’t contribute to nature. They are aware of how useless their existence is.
Men won’t reciprocate your feelings of wanting to feel wanted and needed because men have internal hatred, fear and are incapable of love by default. Men don’t play any important role in a woman’s life. Destruction is men’s main purpose.
Backed up by science. Articles are attached for references.
This isn’t about men hating; this is the truth.
Even some women on FDS can’t seem to handle it.
I’m questioning everything now. It makes even more sense.
Articles:
Do We Even Need Men?
https://lithub.com/do-we-even-need-men/
The Male of the Species: Why Is He Needed?
https://www.nytimes.com/1994/05/17/science/the-male-of-the-species-why-is-he-needed.html
You have to pay to read the second article, so watch the video Men: Why are they needed?
Quotes:
Women go their whole lives trying to get love from men, and because men are not biologically capable of love in the same way women are, they never succeed at it. Women measure their value against their ability to get a man to love them, and they think that there is something lacking in them that makes them unlovable. This damages their self esteem. But the male brain is constructed very differently from the female brain. Women love deeply and unselfishly by design, because we birth and care for children. Men do not, so they are selfish and consumers by nature. There's so many women walking around questioning themselves, 'Why am I so unlovable? Why can't I find a man who will love me? What's wrong with me?' It never occurs to them to project it outward, there's nothing lacking with you, It's something lacking with him. Men aren't mentally or biologically capable of love the way women are.
========
Daughters are restricted and sons are given freedom in the household.
========
WOMEN may not find this surprising, but one of the most persistent and frustrating problems in evolutionary biology is the male. Specifically, where did he come from, and why doesn't he just go away?
========
The great evolutionist John Maynard Smith regarded sex as more or less inexplicable. He talked of "the twofold cost of males." First, it is incomprehensible that any female should want to throw away half her genes and take on someone else's, when theoretically she could just produce clones of herself instead. Secondly, the males of many species are entirely useless at doing anything except sitting around, getting fat at the females' expense, and—in the words of Richard Dawkins—duffing up other males. Among some animals, such as elephant seals, the vast majority of males die as wasteful, disappointed virgins.
========
If sex is the device to reduce the mutational load, and if the male mutation rate is indeed higher, then it doesn't look like a reasonable idea for a female to have anything to do with a male and his contaminated gametes," said Dr. Alexey S. Kondrashov
========
It is also reasonable to speculate that patriarchal societies are, ironically, men’s way of trying to assert their own needs in the face of their patent inferiority.
========
It is possible that the women of our species will soon have the overall choice of doing with very few men, or with none at all. If, in the mean time, they can prevent males from destroying the planet as a viable habitat for humans
Videos:
If you don't have time to watch, here's a video from a male psychotherapist about the destructive behavior of men.
Misogyny: origins of men's hatred of women
If you want to dive into the topic, then here are some videos I watched based on it. I timestamped the parts to make it easier to watch.
The one you love (male) is a consumer
https://www.youtube.com/live/0iKU-Xk66Js?si=6GW8wZG3mUJB4Tc4&t=2382
Timestamps:
39:48—49:11
51:02—59:57
1:01:43—1:04:31
1:06:12—1:10:32
1:17:14—1:25:37
1:28:17—1:32:20
1:33:36—1:36:33
1:38:23—1:43:16 I wish Reddit women who ask stupid male questions would hear this one.
1:46:01—1:49:30
1:50:50—1:52:39
Transcripts from the video:
When men have too much freedom, they self-destruct.
You ain't nothing but a prey that has mastered how to get caught by her predators.
Men: Why are they needed?
https://www.youtube.com/live/5R_1qk_ppeg
Timestamps:
14:03—15:39
20:06—45:40
51:44—1:12:03
1:13:54—2:14:14
Transcripts from the video:
Why philosophy had become a male dominating territory for them to make themselves valuable. The male's purpose is to try to become valuable because they have no value.
The nuclear family made the woman try to depend on help from a male when the nature of a male ain't even designed to help you because he's designed to consume and sit around and be wasteful.
Manipulated and brainwashed for centuries to desire penis. At the level that you do, you have been manipulated into worshiping penis, you have been manipulated into hating other women, and you hate them so much that you want men to take her place. You don't actually like men; you like women in men's bodies because everything that you want the male to do is the nature of a woman. The male is a parasite by Nature. Women produced males to carry genes for the times that they wanted to genetically survive. For the times that they wanted to genetically survive, the male is expendable and he's only here to pass genes at certain times really. You ain't even supposed to be fucking these males for pleasure, for fun, and none of that shit. You ain't supposed to be living with them, you ain't supposed to be marrying them, you ain't supposed to be trying to have no relationship with them because they ain't capable of that. Their existence is still questionable. It's called Mother Earth, it's called Mother Nature; their existence is questionable. So where, how did your attraction from males get to a point of being so stupid and out of control through a bunch of damn brainwashing and through the chemical concoction of semen and through male DNA being on your brain. The chemical concoction of semen and through male DNA being on your brain. They have multiple ways of making you sacrifice yourself for a damn survival. You must look at the foundation of life, and it starts with the damn biology that all of y'all seem to be overlooking and wonder why your relationships fucked up. Wonder why it just ain't working cause you are going against nature.
Biologically this is interesting info, and aligns with other things I’ve seen.
I recently read “The Genetic Superiority of Women” (written by a man), and it was a fascinating analysis of the XX structure and how it performs better than XY in terms of overall health, immunity, genetic purity, etc.
I also recently watched a documentary on elephants, and the women elephants live together in matrix groups (moms daughters babies etc), while the boys grow up, leave and live as solitary bulls. This is because the bull elephants are destructive, aggressive and suck up resources. The female elephants support and protect each other and raise the babies over decades, only mating occasionally with bulls. Most bulls die young or as virgins. And elephants are one of the more intelligent, empathetic and nurturing mammals, very similar to humans.
It just makes sense to live in groups of women, raise the young, and keep men on the fringes of society. There is evidence that Neolithic people lived this way, and some cultures still do. It’s safer for children, and more supportive for mothers.
IMO Western nuclear families are terrible, isolate women from each other and from support, and create dangerous hierarchies that leave women powerless and at high risk for abuse by men.
While there may be some “good men,” I don’t think western nuclear family structure encourages men to be their best. In fact, men lack accountability and spiral downward when they aren’t in strong communities, and encouraged (forced?) to behave in a generous manner. Pro-social women-centric societies ensure that only kind, caring and empathetic men are admitted to the circle. I believe these structures would improve our world (and men) dramatically.
The NYT article and the ITT video are good too. Thanks for sharing.
Princella can be a bit much for me, but she makes some interesting points. Princella also did an interview w Previn Karian (the man in the ITT interview). It was pretty cool, very interesting.
Honestly I think most of these writers and producers are saying inflammatory things to make people pay attention, and to create scientific debate. Their points are worthy of reflection, further study and analysis. These topics have never been explored, and I applaud the people bringing them up.
What’s that quote, “Who controls you? The one you’re not allowed to criticize.”
I see FDSers in these comments so worried about criticizing men, and leaping to defend them - it’s odd to me. I thought we all agreed that most men are scrotes & untrustworthy. They’re SO dangerous that we have a podcast, a forum, articles and support groups to keep us safe from them!
But suddenly now when a post admits that men are problematic, women freak out and rush to defend? So. Very. Strange.
It's tempting to see the world in black and white but it's seldom the truth.
The one person who has taken care of me in my life is my brother. Without him I would have been lost. He has empathy. He cares.