.png)
To all of you women who are saying that you'll just do abstinence, then the men will just rape you. (do abstinence though! Its all the more reason NOT to sleep with rapists. Sleeping with rapists is worse than practicing Abstinence. READ THE COMMENTS in this thread but the tldr is to get politically active and become more hardcore in politically advancing womens interests, power and rights.)
I've heard from men say that the more radical a woman acts, the more radical a man acts in the opposite direction. (This is cap because submissive women in Islam, is what led to women being forced to cover themselves head-to-toe, and little girls being wed in child marriages to middle-aged old men/pedophiles/predators, women not allowed to be hired for any jobs that earn money, women not allowed outside of the house without an escort, women getting killed for hanging out with a man she's not married to. Pickmes who support laws that strip women's rights will lead America down the same path. )
If all the women in America go on a sex-strike, abstain from sex and refuse sex to all men, then men will become more radicalized and desperate. Men will start raping (they already are, but it will be at a mass-scale) and rape might become legalized, unofficially or officially.
And the patriarchal courts will defend the man and paint you as a false accuser. The accused men will call themselves Johnny Depp 2.0 and call you Amber Heard 2.0. The courts and patriarchy will judge them as false rape accusations. And you won't know what to do or how to handle it. You're not rich.
Do look at third-world Islamic countries under Sharia law, where women are not allowed to go outside without a man, and women are forced to dress head-to-toe.
Where little girls are forced into child-marriages with old male pedophiles 2x 3x her age.
Our American (and western) society has not stooped this low yet, but this is the route that it's going.
Think of all the Muslim women who are on sex strikes, refusing casual sex. Problem solved? No! These women are still getting raped, then after getting raped, their neighborhood executes the woman for "allowing herself to get raped." Honor killing.
Stop thinking abstinence is the solution to everything. YES, you SHOULD do abstinence as a form of protest, blame the Roe vs Wade so that men can start pushing to legalize abortion again so that the man can have sex with women again.
However, abstinence is only going to work so long. Men could double down, and resort to rape against your abstinence.
After all, men are anti-abortion because these men get "biologically rewarded" if you have their rape-baby.
So why would a man push for legalizing abortion, when you having his baby, would biologically reward him and pass down his defective genes?
A man's primal drive is to pass down his genes; that's why men freak out and walk out of the family when the man finds out that his son that he raised for a decade, isn't biologically his own son.
Men are anti-abortion and pro-life for this reason, they want their defective genes to pass down. Men call themselves cucks if they are to raise stepchildren from a single mom; most men don't want to be "cucks."
At the same time, if no women are having sex with men en-masse, men will stop and realize that: they need their defective genes passed down SOMEHOW.
War invasions were for the purpose of rape.
Men will just resort to legalized rape.
So, be on your toes. Just because you have abstinence as a SOLUTION to YOUR problems, doesn't mean that your future daughters, or future daughters. They might not even be given the choice of abstinence.
Just keep your eyes open. You can simply not have sex, awesome, but we are a Western nation and a minority. The rest of the world doesn't give women the choice to say no. And as we get more conservative, that's coming. Just look at Sharia Law. Mixing religion and government.
Men will justify whatever, to get his genes passed down, because he is biologically rewarded. A rapist doesn't want his rapebaby aborted. And men become incels if they can't get sex from women no matter how hard they try. They become radicalized. And as women, we shouldn't have babies with poor men who are going to ditch us as soon as we had his baby. I see so many single moms in society, and men and pickmes blaming the single moms for "Choosing the wrong man."
(P.S. the reason the man ditched the woman after she had his baby, is because he doesn't want to waste resources on the child, he wants to use his limited resources to have more babies with other women, to ensure his genetics keep passing on. War conqueror mentality. Many of these men attempt, but fail to re-marry, so he's just sitting and living alone, single. )
This is working so far, but if all women go on a sex-strike, men will resort to illegal means to attain sex, or find a way to legalize rape. Or men would do things like overturn discrimination laws that require companies to hire a set number of women, and start a mass-movement to make women poor and unable to get jobs. Once women are poor, they can't survive in society without having sex with a man.
I know I'm making things sound scary, but this legitimately could happen, not tomorrow, but in 10 years. 20 years. You never know, just look at other countries today, or look at what the world was like 50 years ago.
We may have freedom now, we've fought for freedom, but freedom can just as easily be taken away from us.
“Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where women were free.”
The best way to protect your own freedom is to watch everybody else's back. That's the essense of community.
Also women stripped of freedoms won't be "taken care of" like spoiled housewives that pickmes and conservatives might ASSUME. Pickmes will be surprised that once women are universally stripped of all freedoms, pickmes will be in abundance. With an abundance, all women (Except 1%) would be treated the same way as black slaves in the past. They will become enslaved. There's still laws.
American history is not simply a narrative of continual progress toward greater and greater freedom.
While freedom can be achieved, it may also be reduced or rescinded. It can never be taken for granted.
What can also be a solution in the future is wearing a wedding ring out in pubic even if you're not married. Remember, these cretins want women to be married before having sex. So, get a basic, plain wedding ring and wear it when you're out and about. Yes, married women can get raped, but they'll think long and hard about touching you if you have a gold ring on your finger. They don't need to know you bought it to keep them away.
If husband passes before me one day, I fully intend to keep my rings on my finger in public in certain areas because I wouldn't be interested in finding another man and I wouldn't want to be looked upon as a target.
Very useful post. This country may have eliminated legalized slavery, but the economy was never reformed to compensate for the reliance on free and near-free labor, so we remain mired in the exploitation of women, immigrants and other disenfranchised populations.
Anna I am old and from my erspective, you aren't fear mongering at all. As others have also stated, the subjugation of women during their prime childbearing years isn't a bug, it's a feature.
I don't want women to sleep with closeted rapists, I don't want anyone to misinterpret my post this way. I'm telling women that abstinence is fine, but women need to fight for their rights more, aside from doing abstinence. Yes, my post IS fear-mongering. You don't think it'll happen in your generation, but look at any Muslim country. Westerners and many men are blaming feminism and women's rights for low birth rates and why they can't get laid. They point to misogynistic Muslim countries as examples of how shitty men can still get laid and pass down their genes. Many men unironically are pushing America in that direction. Billionaires and rich corrupt male politicians are doing this the most. I'm not fear mongering, this is the real world. Just a few days ago, Roe & Wade was overturned. States can now officially control women's bodies because you never know, they might ban contraceptives next. They might ban condoms next. My solutions aren't that good, they are a start. I want more brains to come together to come up with better solutions than the ones I posted in my comments. I can drag my solutions to the OP of the thread to make it more clear. One woman came up with a solution that all women should get guns. That's crazy right?
I don't know what the point of this post was other than to fearmonger. Your response to ZyraZ with some suggestions of how to exert more feminist influence was a lot more useful than random suggestions that women are being executed for sex strikes en masse (without providing any evidence) and predicting that society will degenerate into a sexual Mad Max in the next few decades with prisons overfilled with new mothers. Telling women that abstinence is useless because we can be raped is like telling people they may as well kill themselves because they're going to die anyway. It would have been more useful for you to advise that we all sterilize ourselves.
You're clearly a woman concerned about the kind of society-wide misogyny we're all threatened by and have ideas about how women can protect themselves and each other, so if you're going to bring up a problem, bring the solution at the same time and don't bury it halfway down the comment section.
There is so much truth in this post. I know it is hard to read for some and maybe hard to accept, but I’m happy we can now speak the truth in our own space.
I agree! I belong to minority group (Christian) from India, aka a rape capital of the world. Even wives cannot say no, so marital rapes are super common.
Lawmakers know that women will abstain sex and hence why they excluded rapes from abortion.
I am so much happy since I left this shithole and moved to Canada. I highly recommend that other to move away from. I know it is easier said than done but men are violent!
Abstinence is still important. It's smart. You can't just say keep having sex with potential rapists so that they won't rape u when you refuse. Abstinence is the only stand against what is happening rn. Plus it actually is beneficial and natural. We aren't desperate for sex like men are.
I’ve been on a sex strike for 5 years now. I don’t need a man to do what a vibrator can do. Any man on the planet is literally replaceable with a $30 piece of plastic. They’re all worthless scums. I’m not even searching for a man, and the one’s who approached me I told to screw off. Female energy only in my life..
I'm having a difficult time trying to understand what you suggest. For me it sounds now; that you need to vet and keep dating and have sex with men because otherwise we are going to get raped in the end due to radicalisation of men. Can you explain this a bit more?
1 thing didn't sit right: pro-life anti-abortion society. It's a pro-femicide, pro-female erasure society. I'm sure men will be able to get abortions for their mistress just fine. Birthing bodies don't have rights because you cannot protect what you cannot define. Female forward, the mods say but how can we move forward if we are not allowed to talk about female erasure and the obvious danger of male violence and the colonization of female bodies? I mean, what happened? This is not scrottit, so what are we afraid of? Who are we trying to please?
Ooo, a blackpill thread! Men’s civility is a thin veneer for peacocking among themselves, and they readily discard it the moment it impacts their ability to reproduce their Y chromosome.
Just remember: women can have pregnancy forced upon us, but not motherhood. If gestating a baby wasn’t your choice, then you are under no obligation to care for it.
Everyone dies eventually; there is no excuse to be low down, and those who are earn their misery.
sis i have been screaming this to any of my friends who will listen all day - a hot take but the absolutely positively 100% correct take.
I was just wondering today that if more women start abstaining from sex if men will turn to sex workers so they can continue to fuck and run..then again, I would think that sex workers must be reconsidering their options too right about now..but the idea that men will just feel empowered even more to rape has definitely crossed my mind more than a few times today. Judging by the nasty comments I'm seeing by incel types on twitter they are floating all over this. It's only going to go downhill. Can't help but wonder about the future of this space all things considered..wow, so much suckiness in one week.
Sex Abstinence is a solution for YOU, but it won't be an OPTION for your daughters. Roe vs Wade overturned. Pro-Life Anti-Abortion Society.
in Politics
To all of you women who are saying that you'll just do abstinence, then the men will just rape you. I've heard from men say that the more radical a woman acts, the more radical a man acts in the opposite direction. (This is cap because submissive women in Islam, is what led to women being forced to cover themselves head-to-toe, and little girls being wed in child marriages to middle-aged old men/pedophiles/predators, women not allowed to be hired for any jobs that earn money, women not allowed outside of the house without an escort, women getting killed for hanging out with a man she's not married to. Pickmes who support laws that strip women's rights will lead America down the same path. ) If all the women in America go on a sex-strike, abstain from sex and refuse sex to all men, then men will become more radicalized and desperate. Men will start raping (they already are, but it will be at a mass-scale) and rape might become legalized, unofficially or officially. And the patriarchal courts will defend the man and paint you as a false accuser. The accused men will call themselves Johnny Depp 2.0 and call you Amber Heard 2.0. The courts and patriarchy will judge them as false rape accusations. And you won't know what to do or how to handle it. You're not rich. Do look at third-world Islamic countries under Sharia law, where women are not allowed to go outside without a man, and women are forced to dress head-to-toe. Where little girls are forced into child-marriages with old male pedophiles 2x 3x her age. Our American (and western) society has not stooped this low yet, but this is the route that it's going. Think of all the Muslim women who are on sex strikes, refusing casual sex. Problem solved? No! These women are still getting raped, then after getting raped, their neighborhood executes the woman for "allowing herself to get raped." Honor killing. Stop thinking abstinence is the solution to everything. YES, you SHOULD do abstinence as a form of protest, blame the Roe vs Wade so that men can start pushing to legalize abortion again so that the man can have sex with women again. However, abstinence is only going to work so long. Men could double down, and resort to rape against your abstinence. After all, men are anti-abortion because these men get "biologically rewarded" if you have their rape-baby. So why would a man push for legalizing abortion, when you having his baby, would biologically reward him and pass down his defective genes? A man's primal drive is to pass down his genes; that's why men freak out and walk out of the family when the man finds out that his son that he raised for a decade, isn't biologically his own son. Men are anti-abortion and pro-life for this reason, they want their defective genes to pass down. Men call themselves cucks if they are to raise stepchildren from a single mom; most men don't want to be "cucks." At the same time, if no women are having sex with men en-masse, men will stop and realize that: they need their defective genes passed down SOMEHOW. War invasions were for the purpose of rape. Men will just resort to legalized rape. So, be on your toes. Just because you have abstinence as a SOLUTION to YOUR problems, doesn't mean that your future daughters, or future daughters. They might not even be given the choice of abstinence. Just keep your eyes open. You can simply not have sex, awesome, but we are a Western nation and a minority. The rest of the world doesn't give women the choice to say no. And as we get more conservative, that's coming. Just look at Sharia Law. Mixing religion and government. Men will justify whatever, to get his genes passed down, because he is biologically rewarded. A rapist doesn't want his rapebaby aborted. And men become incels if they can't get sex from women no matter how hard they try. They become radicalized. And as women, we shouldn't have babies with poor men who are going to ditch us as soon as we had his baby. I see so many single moms in society, and men and pickmes blaming the single moms for "Choosing the wrong man." (P.S. the reason the man ditched the woman after she had his baby, is because he doesn't want to waste resources on the child, he wants to use his limited resources to have more babies with other women, to ensure his genetics keep passing on. War conqueror mentality. Many of these men attempt, but fail to re-marry, so he's just sitting and living alone, single. ) This is working so far, but if all women go on a sex-strike, men will resort to illegal means to attain sex, or find a way to legalize rape. Or men would do things like overturn discrimination laws that require companies to hire a set number of women, and start a mass-movement to make women poor and unable to get jobs. Once women are poor, they can't survive in society without having sex with a man. I know I'm making things sound scary, but this legitimately could happen, not tomorrow, but in 10 years. 20 years. You never know, just look at other countries today, or look at what the world was like 50 years ago. We may have freedom now, we've fought for freedom, but freedom can just as easily be taken away from us.
“Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where women were free.”
The best way to protect your own freedom is to watch everybody else's back. That's the essense of community.
Also women stripped of freedoms won't be "taken care of" like spoiled housewives that pickmes and conservatives might ASSUME. Pickmes will be surprised that once women are universally stripped of all freedoms, pickmes will be in abundance. With an abundance, all women (Except 1%) would be treated the same way as black slaves in the past. They will become enslaved. There's still laws. American history is not simply a narrative of continual progress toward greater and greater freedom. While freedom can be achieved, it may also be reduced or rescinded. It can never be taken for granted.