The so-called "sexual liberation" did nothing for women but create more lazy entitled scrotes having easy & free access to women's bodies, resulting in creating children out of wedlock, women getting used for their bodies (free prostitution service) and cheap brokeass losers spreading their worthless genes...While slut shaming and sexual double standards against women still present till this fucking day, and men can still act like total hoes and society won't give them an ounce of the shit that women get...in short "sexual liberation' changed things to the worse for women.
Her book is great! I'm listening to lots of podcasts where she is getting interviewed - she's everywhere right now and it's fully deserved. I'd love to hear her on the FDS podcast, every discussion I've heard so far has been quite "serious" and the Queens are so funny and spicy
17
Unknown member
Oct 05, 2023
Replying to
I believe she did do a podcast about sexual reaganites on FDS.
Guest
Aug 05, 2022
I'm glad this is getting attention, but I have a big issue with some of the ways it's being framed.
I think we need to be focusing on why *men* haven't changed (or barely changed at all). It seems that we are always putting all the responsibility on women or feminism. I know we need to protect ourselves, so we have to make informed and healthy choices. But when will we talk about the choices men are making? They are clearly making things worse for *everyone*, including themselves. And yet it's always women this and women that.
Just today, The Independent (UK) published an article about all the men under 60 who have ED and have to take medication to "perform". I haven't read it yet, but I wonder how much they are talking about the choices these men are making (watching corn). A couple of quotes posted were about men feeling pressure to perform, and men lamenting about women focusing on penis size, but nothing about men's choices.
12
Unknown member
Aug 04, 2022
Loved this podcast! The dating and sex culture is crazy right now and it feels validating to have woman speaking up about it.
The one point of disagreement I had with the podcast was when she said that some women willing to sleep with a man on the first date disadvantages other women who prefer to wait to have sex.
I think this is absolutely true when it comes to LVMs and Scrotes. When LVMs put money in the vending machine and sex doesn't come out, they get confused and disgruntled, and then move on to the next sex vending machine aka woman <sarcasm>
However, it doesn't disadvantage HVW from finding HVM because a HVM is not looking to be an active participant in hookup culture.
Yes if the price of sex was a house, ring, and wedding, more men would be prioritizing those milestones. However, I am doubtful that those men would suddenly become high value. They would just be LVM that do the bare minimum to access a woman's body which in this scenario is commitment.
Wow this was excellent. Thanks so much for introducing me to Feminist Current. I would LOVE if Meghan Murphy was a featured guest on the FDS podcast!!!
.png)
The so-called "sexual liberation" did nothing for women but create more lazy entitled scrotes having easy & free access to women's bodies, resulting in creating children out of wedlock, women getting used for their bodies (free prostitution service) and cheap brokeass losers spreading their worthless genes...While slut shaming and sexual double standards against women still present till this fucking day, and men can still act like total hoes and society won't give them an ounce of the shit that women get...in short "sexual liberation' changed things to the worse for women.
Her book is great! I'm listening to lots of podcasts where she is getting interviewed - she's everywhere right now and it's fully deserved. I'd love to hear her on the FDS podcast, every discussion I've heard so far has been quite "serious" and the Queens are so funny and spicy
I'm glad this is getting attention, but I have a big issue with some of the ways it's being framed.
I think we need to be focusing on why *men* haven't changed (or barely changed at all). It seems that we are always putting all the responsibility on women or feminism. I know we need to protect ourselves, so we have to make informed and healthy choices. But when will we talk about the choices men are making? They are clearly making things worse for *everyone*, including themselves. And yet it's always women this and women that.
Just today, The Independent (UK) published an article about all the men under 60 who have ED and have to take medication to "perform". I haven't read it yet, but I wonder how much they are talking about the choices these men are making (watching corn). A couple of quotes posted were about men feeling pressure to perform, and men lamenting about women focusing on penis size, but nothing about men's choices.
Loved this podcast! The dating and sex culture is crazy right now and it feels validating to have woman speaking up about it.
The one point of disagreement I had with the podcast was when she said that some women willing to sleep with a man on the first date disadvantages other women who prefer to wait to have sex.
I think this is absolutely true when it comes to LVMs and Scrotes. When LVMs put money in the vending machine and sex doesn't come out, they get confused and disgruntled, and then move on to the next sex vending machine aka woman <sarcasm>
However, it doesn't disadvantage HVW from finding HVM because a HVM is not looking to be an active participant in hookup culture.
Yes if the price of sex was a house, ring, and wedding, more men would be prioritizing those milestones. However, I am doubtful that those men would suddenly become high value. They would just be LVM that do the bare minimum to access a woman's body which in this scenario is commitment.
Wow this was excellent. Thanks so much for introducing me to Feminist Current. I would LOVE if Meghan Murphy was a featured guest on the FDS podcast!!!
Okayyyyy I'm about to listen in! Thank you❤!
Are her podcasts FDS proof by chance? Thanks in advance