What I don't understand is the contradiction between men saying as they age their value only goes up, but as women have said on here that on their OLD profiles they will lie about their age as much as 20 years younger...so why lie about age if older men have more value? Why not embrace the mantra that men "age like wine" and put your real age in bio? This has happened IRL too. One dude came to me at the gym, physically he had graying in his hair, wrinkles, he asked how old I was, and if I had a personal trainer, I said 16 (which I was at the time) and he said "Awesome, I'm 29." Ummm. I think not Sir.
16
Unknown member
Dec 19, 2022
Replying to
"30" year old man chatting up a 16 year old girl is "awesome"Fucking pedophile
My child with a much older man was born partially deaf, cross-eyed, autistic, and will likely be diagnosed with bipolar or borderline personality disorder as an adult. Don’t have babies with old scrotes.
6
Unknown member
Dec 19, 2022
Notice how complications start to occur when thw man is 30, but they keep reiterating 45 as the geriatric age to start a family while for women it's 35- hmm... interesting.
They need to bite the bullet and accept the fact that men and women, as members of the exact SAME SPECIES, have the SAME fertility timelines. For both men and women, the optimal time for procreation is mid twenties to mid thirties; fertility typically peaks around 25 for everyone but doesn't decrease much until you hit 40+. That's when BOTH men and women start to have more issues with fertility and pregnancy complications.
Of course, there are always individual exceptions, and a 40+ woman will have an easier time conceiving with a 30 year old man than with a 40+ year old man, as the younger half of the couple can "compensate" with their higher fertility.
This is what men have been doing for years with younger wives; however, sperm can be a little but more risky in this regard as it's constantly being made every month and thus there's more opportunity for mutations to form as the man ages, whereas women's eggs age at a steadier rate.
It hasn't really been socially acceptable for an older woman to marry a (significantly) younger man, otherwise you'd see plenty of children born to older women over the years, and there wouldn't be as strong propaganda about women crumbling to dust over 35 (or 25!). Essentially what I'm saying is men have deluded themselves into thinking they're super duper fertile until the day they die by reproducing with much younger women, and riding the coattails of OUR fertility.
Usually, older women are trying to have babies with even older men or men of the same age, and because they are much less successful, men came to the erroneous conclusion that fertility is more of an issue for us - when it's usually their sperm that's huffing and puffing and can't get very far without a 19-25 year old doing the heavy lifting.
Well in the UK, many women date younger men. I've observed this since 2016 and it has been growing. Most women I know in their 30s are dating men in their 20s. Older men seem to be out of fashion with young women these days.
What I don't understand is the contradiction between men saying as they age their value only goes up, but as women have said on here that on their OLD profiles they will lie about their age as much as 20 years younger...so why lie about age if older men have more value? Why not embrace the mantra that men "age like wine" and put your real age in bio? This has happened IRL too. One dude came to me at the gym, physically he had graying in his hair, wrinkles, he asked how old I was, and if I had a personal trainer, I said 16 (which I was at the time) and he said "Awesome, I'm 29." Ummm. I think not Sir.
My child with a much older man was born partially deaf, cross-eyed, autistic, and will likely be diagnosed with bipolar or borderline personality disorder as an adult. Don’t have babies with old scrotes.
Notice how complications start to occur when thw man is 30, but they keep reiterating 45 as the geriatric age to start a family while for women it's 35- hmm... interesting.
They need to bite the bullet and accept the fact that men and women, as members of the exact SAME SPECIES, have the SAME fertility timelines. For both men and women, the optimal time for procreation is mid twenties to mid thirties; fertility typically peaks around 25 for everyone but doesn't decrease much until you hit 40+. That's when BOTH men and women start to have more issues with fertility and pregnancy complications.
Of course, there are always individual exceptions, and a 40+ woman will have an easier time conceiving with a 30 year old man than with a 40+ year old man, as the younger half of the couple can "compensate" with their higher fertility.
This is what men have been doing for years with younger wives; however, sperm can be a little but more risky in this regard as it's constantly being made every month and thus there's more opportunity for mutations to form as the man ages, whereas women's eggs age at a steadier rate.
It hasn't really been socially acceptable for an older woman to marry a (significantly) younger man, otherwise you'd see plenty of children born to older women over the years, and there wouldn't be as strong propaganda about women crumbling to dust over 35 (or 25!). Essentially what I'm saying is men have deluded themselves into thinking they're super duper fertile until the day they die by reproducing with much younger women, and riding the coattails of OUR fertility.
Usually, older women are trying to have babies with even older men or men of the same age, and because they are much less successful, men came to the erroneous conclusion that fertility is more of an issue for us - when it's usually their sperm that's huffing and puffing and can't get very far without a 19-25 year old doing the heavy lifting.
Jeez. So I need a young man to father my kids and an old man as a companion.