.png)
Seeing a LOT of discourse among the incel set about how the older the mother is, the "older" the baby is DNA-wise and this will eventually "age the genetic pool?" No one seems to be able to cite these claims, but I was wondering if any science minded ladies have heard of this and could debunk or prove.
I wish I could ignore them, but this stuff always makes me anxious because my HVM spouse and I agreed it's best to wait for more children, both for financial reasons and for my personal comfort; are the 'cels right, is this irresponsible?
they always blame it on the mother. it takes two to make babies. if they think the female DNA "ages" the baby, then tha male DNA also does.
i am a science lady and i have never in my entire life heard that "aged babies DNA" BS. what i do know is that the older the parent (regardless of sex), the higher the risk of complications. the baby might be disabled in some way, or with a syndrome. but it isn't born 'older'.
and what exactly do they mean by that anyway? what is an 'older' DNA if the human being has just been born? what is ageing?
if they are so obsessed with youth, maybe they should do more skincare themselves and eat healthy in order to look less like shit-eater potatoes.
Men throughout history have been fathering children well into middle age and beyond. An elderly woman has never had a baby. So...
I dont know the science behind this, but I doubt there is any. Sounds like some scrotery pseudo-nothing, blaming women for some bullshit that men do.