.png)
Now that I've been thinking about this, it's so glaringly obvious. If a man purports to be HV and a provider (as he should and ought to), then he must PROVIDE. He should have no reservations with having his employer or contractor directly depositing his earnings into an account his wife specifies and to which only she has access. If he's self-employed, then he should immediately deposit his income into this account, without ever being prompted to do so.
The reasons for this are many. Like I said, if he's an actual man and not a scrote, then he should willingly provide for his Queen, and that includes not balking at the possibility that his wife may use their money for her personal expenses. Couple this with the fact that women are indisputably better with money than any man is, and the whole thing just explains itself. Another excellent reason for this is being able to establish a financial safety net in case his scrotiness comes to light, in which case she, and she only, has access to the means that allow her to safely exit her marriage.
A scrote refusing to do so or even hesitating would be giving just another sign of stinginess. In which case... Good, scrotes weeding themselves out.
This is common practice in East Asian countries. It is not uncommon for Chinese, Japanese, and Singaporean women to manage household expenses for their families and give allowances to their husbands. In fact, men from these countries often refer to the management of household expenses as “women’s work”.
I know an older Chinese man who doesn’t really know how much he earns every two weeks, because his wife has managed their money for decades.
The Western world should adopt this practice.
This used to be a thing here in the West. I'm not sure if I would agree as if I were a man, I would hate this. I would at least want some control over the money I worked for. As a woman, I'd feel uncomfortable doing this. Then again, I am not after a provider and I think if I was, the last thing I would want to do would be to constantly beg the man for money. It's a horrible abuse of power on his end of things and he could take advantage. Luckily I have no interest in this sort of relationship.
I agree and disagree.
I think a woman and a man should both have separate bank accounts in a relationship and then a third bank account they share together. The man should be willing to contribute to this third account often, especially if he earns more.
Also, if the woman wants to check his bank account, he should have no problem with this unless he's doing unfaithful things.
Not sure about this it reeks of generational Mommy's boy practices and trauma. most men would be emasculated by this and would be secret haters / keeping the peace