After banning abortion, Republicans getting closer to making a Handmaid's tale reality

A second layer? You mean a jacket? Say "jacket"! It pisses me off how men pretend to be perplexed by womens clothes. "I dont know what it is, that thing that women put on over their other things when they go outside on a chilly day" Thats a jacket, dumbass! They dont undrrstand female repeoductive organs, and they (allegedly) dont understand women's clothing. But by god, they're gonna legislate 'em!

I don't understand why there are still women living in these states voluntarily and all of them aren't taking their daughters and fleeing en masse as long as they still can (... because let's face it: preventing women from leaving the state - especially if they are suspected to be pregnant... which in their minds will be every woman between her first period and menopause - will come next).

I mean if the scrotes want to play "handmaid's tale", let's see how much fun they will have without women around.

This is so terrifying. Matt Walsh was talking about no fault divorce on twitter recently and it makes me never want to get married again to avoid not being able to leave someone.

Oh godddd arms, oh goodddddd ladies armsss. My pene ahhh - must create law because I can’t control my brain 🤡🤡

Oh please! I would get a nice shiny lightweight polyester suffragette white robe type of a dress,with a Ruth Bader Ginsberg collar, and don it over my clothes when I enter the chambers. A nice shiny super lightweight rayon jacket to match and line up ever so perfectly and not take away from the allusion of a robe. Maybe a faux pocket with handkerchief like the guys. Maybe some nice big brass buttons everywhere the men’s jackets have theirs. And platforms to tower over the men. Maybe go go boots under the robe lol Hmmm… now what kind of wig???? Be sooo much more fun if ALL the women in chambers did this, too.

1931 Germany

I was waiting for a 2nd amendment joke

I guess I'll be the voice of dissent in that as long as the dress codes in the legislative offices are applied equally between the sexes, I don't really get the outrage. If men are not allowed to show bare arms, then why is it a problem that women can't? Just because women's fashion tends to be more revealing doesn't mean it's impossible for women to find a blazer or jacket to wear. I'm a radical feminist myself, but I also think we shouldn't be reactionary about things that don't really qualify as oppression. For example if they required heels for women I'd object. But a blanket rule of no bare arms, while annoying, isn't explicitly anti female.