Ah yes the woman has to prove her loyalty. Something historically men have never done for their spouses. That's just one example of the woman expected to sacrifice a part of her life, just to keep up appearances of being loyal to the husband.
The killer couldn't be intimate with women, so he flew into a rage.
The mc donalds worker was a woman. She did the right thing in reporting a criminal. How are we ok electing a criminal as president but suddenly she's in the wrong? Luigi's attorney is citing the constitution to fight for his client, but who cares about the constitution anymore?!
People online are sympathizing with the reason for the murder being unable to be intimate, cause wahmen wouldn't stay by his side! Be celibate to take care of him.
The pickmes are throwing themselves at him saying they'd take care of him. Funny how that fixes nothing.
During the act of the crime, that was an exchange between two men.
Would he had been ugly, he'd have been treated like a lunatic, like the kid who tried assasinating Trump, so yeah. Just imagine if a woman did the same thing. Where he has been treated like a hero in this case, she'd be treated like a crazy cat lady that couldn't find a partner or something like that. I just can't fanthom how people are acting the same way they were in the 70's, during the Ted Bundy's trials, but what can you expect out of Americans?
PD: this just cements the idea that the media shouldn't ever publish the faces of criminals, at all. That can result in biases that go against the principles of a fair court system... And it also goes against the idea of personal privacy.