.png)
Two gay men who both attended law school filed a legal complaint against the City of New York in 2022 arguing that not having access to women's wombs was discrimination. Corey Briskin and Nicholas Maggipinto argued for public access to women's wombs for the sake of depositing their gay sperm. They are suing the City of New York for a taxpayer funded surrogate. When Mayor Eric Adams' office got wind of this, they issued a statement that they "support" the LGTBQ movement, bar none.
One of the men, Briskin, is "pro autonomy" and is a former sex crimes prosecutor. He compared surrogacy to prostitution and reduced the violence and imprisonment in the sex trafficking industry to being the same "as not being compensated for sex work". That is, he is PRO prostitution as long as the woman keeps the money. Yes, this man was a criminal prosecutor. How many pimps do you think he actually punished?
Genevieve Gluck, author and amazing follow on Twitter/X, wrote "gay men now want insurance companies to treat being born male as a disability or as a protected category, one which requires paid compensation. They are protesting the unfairness of not having been born biologically female." That is, they want access to a womb 24/7. How's that slippery slope --- from gay marriage to state sanctioned wombs.
Children conceived with gay sperm and donated embryos are more likely to have childhood cancer, per Danish records. Is surrogacy really the same as IVF?
If you have ties to New York, or are simply appalled by the clear handmaid's tale being pushed by the gay community onto women, please contact your New York state representative today as well as NYC Mayor Eric Adams' office: Office of the Mayor | Contact the Mayor | City of New York (nyc.gov)
Gay men sue New York City to gain access to women's bodies, claim surrogacy is 'fertility treatment' | The Post Millennial | thepostmillennial.com
This is why I'm lowkey done with gay men. Their obsession with surrogacy has made it clear they dehumanize women every bit as viciously as heterosexual fellas and I don't understand why women are so obsessed with fawning over them
I just read a much more credible article from the New York Times, and it seems like their insurance company is discriminating and trying to save money by not offering IVF treatments due to their sexual orientation. To clarify, the insurance company offered IVF treatment to heterosexual couples but not same sex couples. They sued the the city demanding fair treatment. My question is shouldn’t they be suing the insurance company instead of the city? Nonetheless, it still sounds fishy to me. I think they’re trying to change state laws.
Regardless, having a baby is big responsibility and IVF is a small price to pay to bring life into the world. I don’t like how these guys are so cheap about it. I feel like these guys don’t understand and appreciate the work and sacrifice that happens during pregnancy. Most women don’t want to offer their womb because is takes a toll on their body, and is quite an invasive procedure.