Many iconic onscreen relationships are made up of three characters: a man, his wife, and her nagging. The henpecked husband traverses centuries and genres, but why, after decades of feminism, is the nagging wife a character we still accept?
The “nag” in film and TV has some common patterns:
She’s often with a guy who’s kind of mediocre — not as driven or smart or organized as she is.
She might be cast as materialistic, and pushes her husband to strive for more success than he actually wants.
She’s frequently unfaithful, or painted as generally having bad values .
She’s typically middle-aged or older, not framed as especially appealing.
She’s not afraid to raise her voice.
And even if what she asks of her partner is actually pretty reasonable, her tone or the incessantness of her demands is played as insufferably annoying. Thus she can serve as a kind of emotional “scapegoat” allowing viewers to excuse her male partner’s blatantly irresponsible behavior.
Increasingly, stories from the nag’s perspective explore how she’s often an overstretched wife and mom juggling a lot and carrying an intense mental load, while feeling let down by a partner who’s not committing the same effort or showing her due respect.
Here’s our Take on where “the nag” comes from, what we learn from hearing her side, and why it’s time to finally write her out of the story.
The History of the Nag: A folkloric cliche
The shrew character has cropped up in stories for millennia; she even appears in the Bible, in Proverbs 21.9 - ‘It is better to live in a corner of the housetop than in a house shared with a quarrelsome wife.’ Perhaps her best known historic appearance is in Shakespeare’s comedy The Taming of the Shrew, whose plot centers on the attempt to break in an unruly wife and putting an end to her quarrelsome ways. At the time Shakespeare was writing, the stock ‘shrew’ character was often conflated with a witch.
Historian Louise Jackson writes that some women punished for witchcraft were also condemned as ‘scolds’; she documents one who was persecuted for witchcraft because (quote) “instead of fulfilling the expected role of a ‘good’ wife and mother, she had been cursing and shouting at her husband and children.’ In the 1950s and 60s, as white-collar work overtook blue-collar employment for the first time in US history, the American domestic ideal became the Company Man with his picture-perfect housewife keeping everything running behind him.
Countering the housewife ideal, starting in the 1960s second-wave feminism also gained momentum, with women becoming increasingly empowered in and outside of the home. As a result, this era is where the nag really emerges in earnest; she’s a symbol that exists to put women back in their place.
https://the-take.com/watch/the-nag-trope-its-time-to-write-it-out
As I was reading this, the show "Everybody Loves Raymond" comes to mind.
This is why I'm afraid of getting married 😭 It's wayy to common to see especially older men constantly joke that marriage sucks and they hate their wife. It's not some "female nature" to instantly start complaining about everything and refuse to have sex the moment the ring gets put on the finger, it's just men refusing to take accountability again. Scrotes feel accomplished and settled down when they get married, so they don't feel like they have to please their partner anymore because marriage is a destination to them and not a milestone. Then the mask starts slipping off; some get abusive, some get lazy. And the wife has to deal with that burden now, so no wonder she starts to "nag" and doesn't want to have sex with a man who does nothing but make her life worse. If she files for divorce, she is then the bad guy and the man is the victim. That's the case in the majority of marriages
Women are stuck in a double bind because if there's an issue in the relationship, they're told "You need to communicate. You can't expect him to be a mind reader". So then the woman communicates only for the man to label her a nag and ignore her. This is why I don't believe in cOmMuNiCaTiOn for the large issues. (Communicating over very small, easily resolvable issues is fine).