.png)
Simply because nature has built-in double standards. That's how it works.
This last weekend, while at a restaurant in a busy area with a close friend, we spotted a very attractive man. My friend expressed a sense of shame for feeling that she shouldn't want to "admire" his physical beauty while feeling that scrotes who ogle are gross. A couple of days ago, a poster here asked about how to find out if she's a man's """type""". Don't fall for this trap set up in place by the patriarchy.
In nature females are the ones who sexually select based on physical attributes. Males fight with each other over the opportunity to present themselves to the female, who then chooses whether to mate with him. Males don't assess females physically; their drive is to fight for their access, mate and have offspring. So why should humans be so radically different from nature? We shouldn't.
To a normal, non-dysfunctional man, every woman is potentially attractive. An unmarried man that expresses a strong unbalance in his attraction to different women is drawing his unnatural physical preferences from porn, and you should stay away from him. This "men are visual creatures" bs was concocted to facilitate male access to females, not because of an innate desire to sexually select based on looks.
This is where the misguided sense of shame creeps up on women who are still levelling up. They realize they have distinct physical standards for the men they are willing to date, so why shouldn't men be entitled to those too? Because, as I said in the opening paragraph, that's how nature works. If you're only interested in fit men over 6'2" with a strong jawline, deep voice and a full head of thick hair, then you should only entertain an approach made by men with those attributes. Don't lower your standards just because "but what about men?". Embrace them. You, as a woman, are entitled to them.
Say it louder for the ppl in the back!
The way I see it, men are dangerous. In the very best case scenario, when a woman is with Prince Charming, she could die in childbirth. Why should she risk dying for anything less than Prince Charming?
You wouldnt pay Lamborghini price for a Toyota. Dont risk your life for a scrote.
Another double standard that I support are age gaps for women but not for men. Men who creep on teenage girls are dangerous predators. Women who have younger boyfriends were probably pursued by those bf (unlike the reverse). And if the relationship ends, the men haven't been cheated out of their limited fertility windows as is the case for women. Also women take care of their bodies, hair and fashion as they age in a way that men rarely do. And with the gender power imbalance, they can be on more equal footing.
Hello
I am the one who posted about the “type” thing.
I do agree 100% with what you said
My only fear is that I will never meet a HVM who doesnt have a type.
The modern man is so deep in the pornsickness that it became impossible to even consider them worthy of wasting seconds with them.
I think women are much more visual than men, and in a sexual sense too. I think the idea that men are more visual is much more to do with culture and porn than anything hardwired.