Why is it considered empowering to be sexually available to low quality men? Some women claim they feel happy and free doing things like sex work and sex on a first date. I know this is due to philosophy. What is the internal logic?
top of page
bottom of page
It's a patriarchal way of fighting patriarchy. Purity culture is horrible. If you were caught in purity culture shame your whole life then porn culture can seem like freedom. It's not. It's a golden cage. You get attention and superficial admiration but you lose yourself. Because we are all more than our bodies. We are all fully human.
That's the thing about third wave/liberal feminism. It's not supposed to give women power, it 'empowers' them. 'Empowerment' is another word for giving men power and doing things that don't benefit women, while gaslighting yourself into believing that you like it and it makes you happy. The patriarchy loves liberal feminism because the only people that really gain from it are men. Women are more at risk from casual sex because of STDs and UTIs (men are less likely to practice general hygiene or get tested regularly), potentially unwanted pregnancies, pornfried men and high levels of male violence. Also, a lot of men don't even know how to please a woman sexually (and don't even care)! Add all of those aspects up and you get a bad deal as a woman. It's not worth it. It makes more sense to only have sex with men you've thoroughly vetted, within a committed relationship. But that doesn't benefit LVM/scrotes because they don't want to make that effort! They don't want to spend a second more than they have to on you and they want to be able to press a button and get free sex despite having nothing to offer but the audacity and pornsickness/violence. Women who believe that liberal feminism benefits them are either naive and brainwashed by the patriarchy or actively gaslighting themselves. Basically it's a load of bs.
There's a cognitive dissonance among young women (I used to be one of them) when it comes to casual sex. Girls have been indoctrinated, by culture, to think that being sexually active is good and when they have this cognitive dissonance during, or after, casual sex, wondering why they feel so disgusting, like they have been used, and are upset about it, the indoctrination kicks in to tell them that what they are feeling is wrong, unnatural, and if they just continue participating in hookup culture then it will go away.
I remember being taught at school that being traditionally feminine was a negative, it isn't explicitly taught, but the social dynamics, and small comments/jabs, are what teach you positives and negatives. There was a girl who wanted to have children as soon as she could, for example, and we all, collectively, looked down on her for it (she has those children, by the way, and seems to be living a very happy life). I had a feminist mother who looked down on femininity, and who was also sexually promiscious, and know of other girls who come from single-mother families (where this mindset is far more prevalent) who were taught by their mothers that their value lies in their sexuality.
It all goes back to the sexual revolution, and there have been a few insightful interviews of women in the UK, who were young adults at the time, that tell us a lot about the mindset of the period; women were considered prudish, and "uncool", if they didn't put out, and women were consistently putting themselves into situations where they couldn't refuse sexual advances because of their naivety of the nature of men. For example; one women declared that she felt it was more rude to kick a man out of her flat, and decline his advances, than it was to just sleep with him. We were already seeing the breaking down of boundaries. Fathers, men, and mothers, who were against the sexual revolution, were shouted down as either sexist, misogynist, and backwards, who were mostly just trying to protect their daughters from predatory men who hailed themselves as feminists. OF COURSE these men were feminists, it got them what they wanted which was free access to sex from naive women who didn't know any better. This had a rippling effect into the culture depicting sexual women as being liberated from the backwards culture of sex-after-marriage; you still see this to this day.
Then you had the glossy magazines, the likes of Comsopolitan, who were pushing for women to have casual sex, delaying marriage and children, while the female editors of these same magazines were happily married with children. We also have the combined breakdown of the family unit, where fathers are mostly absent, which also creates a domino effect of women being promiscuous because they never had a father figure to give them a basic understanding of how to behave around men, and what to expect from them. Even the girls who come from two-parent households are becoming victims of this pervasive culture the moment they go to university. You then see more of this with the left-leaning progressives of today who push liberal sexuality, sexual-deviancy, and the two-parent household as "problematic" while they themselves are married, with children, and have generational wealth because of it. I'm not saying it's a conspiracy against the fabric of society, but I'm also pretty much saying exactly that. It sounds far too fabricated to be natural.
We have a saying in Conservative circles of "never trust a male feminist" (regardless of what your political affiliation is, this always rings true), because they are dastardly creatures, who very overtly hate women as a whole (probably mummy-issues), that try to use feminism to score access to women while taking on the more extreme progressive views, such as liberal-transgenderism (I mean this to describe a transgenderism that needs no screening or doctors approval to prove of gender dysphoria; it's all self-ID), to push their hatred of women.
There's nothing casual about sex for a female. That's like a doctor telling you he's gonna stick this scalpel into you casually for some casual surgery. It's all risk and little reward. If men want "casual"sex, they can have it with each other, since the ramifications of sex are never casual for women. Casual STDs, casual babies, casual bad reputations and shame...🤣
Literally just a patriarchal mechanism this “Empowerment” to benefit men and become their willing working mules and sex slaves its disgusting