Democratic Congressional Candidate Declares Men Have A ’Right To Sex’ (FDS PODCAST EPISODE 86)

That woman is terrifying and smarmy. The way she says "consent is the issue" clearly insinuating she would change the definition of consent, while guffawing at people pointing it out. And hiding behind her own sexual violence experience. So disingenuous. Also out of touch, look at the price of everything and this is your concern?

And yes legalizing prostitution actually increases vawg, trafficking, and makes it cheaper for the johns and harder for trafficking victims to leave. These women travel to these countries like Germany for seemingly legitimate jobs like house painter, and get thrown in vans and all their documents taken. These women who are lucky enough to make it to the police get fucking laughed at and asked *for their documents* that were taken from her. The police raise their hands 🤷 as they cannot help her. It shouldn't be that easy to literally enslave a person, let alone a whole class of people. There are john reviews online for brothels, where they complain about the slave crying or begging for help to leave, saying it killed their boners/experience. Zero sympathy for the victims. I think about that review sometimes, and wonder if they killed that girl. The nordic model at least makes it harder for these depraved demons to consume women.

I don't feel sorry for the "after the millionth rejection its time to give up" lonely guy either. He's not talking about general friendship. He's talking about women and girls way out of his league and way younger than him. He can't empathize with women and its not cute because it is like something you learn in kindergarten. I work with one of these guys. He follows around all the girls 20 years younger than him, holds them hostage in the parking lot after work, and all the men think he's creepy lol. I don't feel sorry for him. He's too damn old and spoiled rotten by his family. "One time a girl said something mean to me in highschool" gtfo that's it, that's your joker origin story? Bruh 🙄.

We gotta vote because I think politicians like this will gain traction from both left and right wing dudes. Although it's a stupid hill to die on considering the state of the world.

If almost 30% of men aren't having sex, this also means that almost 30% of women aren't having sex either. Has it not occurred to any of these 'woe the poor men' people that maybe they should talk to women and see what our take is? Or that it's actually us who deserve sympathy? Or maybe they deliberately ignore that part, because they have a pretty good idea of what we'll say...and it won't make those leftover men look any more appealing.

These men have the right to sex with each other. Every incel male should sacrifice his rectum to their cause. They have no right to women's or children's bodies--only each other.

Just full mask off male supremacy at this point. Not even hiding it. The fact that it's a woman makes this worse somehow

Not to shock anyone, but there are places (and I mean supposedly civilized, western countries) where this is not theory anymore and actually contemplated. There are movements who want to establish a right to get a prostitute's visits covered by health insurance for mentally and physically disabled people (... obviously they really mean men). So these poor, poor men could get a doctor to prescribe them sex and their public health insurance would have to cover the costs. This is not a joke. The supporters seriously consider it a need and "therapy" and call it discrimination that disabled men do not have free access to sex and intimacy. Obviously the rights of the women who are exploited and enslaved to provide those "services" do not matter.

I saw a documentary about it recently and it really made me sick to my stomach. There are seriously also parents with mentally disabled sons or wives whose husbands have dementia who support this and would hire a prositute for their sons/husbands and complain that they have to pay for that "therapy" out of their own pocket for now because their son/husband is so calm and happy afterwards. And they were not all highly functioning people. In addition to the whole prositution issue there is also a huge problem on the side of the person the prostitute is hired for: can a mentally disabled man truly give informed consent to what is happening here or is this ultimately rape by proxy orchestrated by their own parents/wives and paid for by public health insurance? Let's just imagine parents would hire a male prostitute to have sex with their severely mentally disabled daughter or a husband would hire someone to have sex with his wife with Alzheimer's. All alarm bells would ring, right?

The woman behind that article is another level of pickme, or was bribed off by a scrote. Entitlement to sex and government involvement sounds like something out of a dystopian horror film - it also sounds like something from a the depraved mind of a scrote (probably watches hentai and fetish porn about sex robots).

It doesn't shock me. Men dress like slobs, don't wash their asses, can't manage their money and can't secure a career..... on top of it they use Redpill tactics of ignoring women, playing text games, shit testing us, and all around treat women like shit. imagine the shocked pickchu faces when men are getting LESS sex! Lvm have nothing to offer us and treat us like they hate us.

And thats the other thing- entitlement to sex will further devalue women - not just monetarily- women will actually be reduced to being just seen as living flashlights. (And we already have enough scrotes in that mentality) women will be looked at like broodmares.

Typical scrote mindset- all of the audacity. Instead of working on themselves, having more to offer, and treating us like humans- they'd rather spin it around and make it the women's fault. Oh, it's the women's problem to fix it, they need to now be broodmares. This is probably the only time they've ever made such an outcry in the political space.

Well, it's time to do arson!

People really forget that sex makes babies without human intervention. It’s not casual and theres nothing about it, objectively, that could be interpreted as transactional. A right to sex is like a right to marriage, or a relationship or company. it would be a right to the body of others. Nobody has the right to anyone else, and the decriminalization of selling and purchasing people’s bodies for sex use would be awful. Bodies being sold and purchased is an assault on human dignity and what needs to be a right is the right to sexuality being about intimacy and desire only full stop. Nobody should be having sex for money it’s dehumanizing. When you can buy a woman‘s body/ sex for a price, her whole self, including her capacity for intimacy and to create life becomes a commodity. She is a commodity seen the same as a pair of shoes. Rape would just be theft, she becomes equitated with inanimate objects. Nobody ever talks about women‘s right to a relationship, love or even fidelity. Just men and sex. Men are violent when they don’t have sex? That’s an entitlement issue. They are violent because of their wrong beliefs they are entitled to sex so this candidate wants to legally enforce their psychopathic backward thinking by law? Fix their entitlement issue by making them legally entitled? Anyway this isn’t a movement it’s just an ignorant individual with a mic. If anything this is proof that the sex industry is about male superiority right rather than female empowerment (which was always a joke) as we see the attitude of a woman who’s had her body sold. This is a good reason why selling bodies and sexuality should be illegal - so people who have been caught being sold can’t spread thelie Stockholm’s syndrome beliefs from a public platform. Porn needs to be illegal so we don’t have politicans who are porn addicts making the decisions.

After listening to the episode I asked the guy I'm seeing rn what he thought about men who don't have sex, and therefore the idea of having the right to have sex with women. He just immediately said that the idea to implement something like that is ridiculous. I then told him about the negative effects that lack of sex apparently has on men. He just looked really confused, but then laughed and said well it's natural selection 😂 wonderful!

A “right to sex” Gee, I wonder who would be expected to provide it…

I have never heard of this person before, but she sounds like the character Brandi Maxxxx from the show Parks and Recreation - the adult film star who was running for political office at the same time Leslie Knope was running.

Brandi means well, but she's actually making things worse for Leslie (and women in general). She's constantly bringing up sex when it has questionable relevancy to the topic at hand.

It's been said before, but real life really is indistinguishable from satire these days.

Nice smackdown ladies. For some pickme would-be politician to be spouting this nonsense is truly troubling. And she's on OnlyFans? Good lord.

There are so many things to say about this. One take away is women are consenting to have sex with 70% of men because they are appealing to women. 30% of men are so undesirable to women that women refuse to consent to sue with them. The responsibility of being appealing to women falls to these unfuckable men. The 70% of men getting some have no interest in helping theses men because their odds are better. Women aren't responsible for undesirable men improving themselves. But this stat makes it clearer to me why men cheat without consequences. They can.

Say this moves forward. What are the implications? I seriously doubt they’ll regulate our bodies as strictly as they’ve regulated an actual medical product like insulin. Or an actual service like nursing. Human trafficking will basically be coded into health infrastructure (which it basically is now). Horrifying. Truly.