I get how she could be misunderstood but she is telling women that we have somehow been brainwashed to pay scrotes get the chance to have terrible sex with us and then they don't even have to come to a full stop before they roll us out into the streets lol.
All in the name of so-called equality.
Part of feminism has been twisted for male benefit. When some of us noticed we were more than ever sad, single, used and losing, we knew this wasn't the answer and took a step back. But we still have women trying to be "equals" while hating it because we are still being treated with disrespect ..and now we have to even pay for the privilege.
She is telling women to be responsible for her part. Not paying, letting him open doors and expecting a gentleman doesn't make you not a feminist. Even if the 50/50, "equal rights=equal lefts" bros tantrum about it.
17
Unknown member
Jul 19, 2023
It is to the advantage of lazy, shitty men that society pretends that everyone has reached true equality and ignores history.
"But you owe him sex if he pays for anything for you" That is a shitty way of thinking and men don't think they owe you a relationship if you clean and cook for them either.
14
Unknown member
Jul 19, 2023
From this small snippet, it sounds like she’s blaming women and feminism for stingy scrotes who don’t pay for dinner dates. Fail.
10
Unknown member
Jul 19, 2023
Replying to
Well she's specifically talking about liberal feminism, because it is the lib fems, brainwashed by patriarchy, that believe (or have been made to believe by men) that they should pay for themselves or it's misogynistic otherwise. Radical femmes are on board with the male paying. Lib fems are not.
Unknown member
Jul 19, 2023
Replying to
Correct, but it’s still not feminism’s fault that scrotes behave badly. That’s on scrotes. I’m gonna take a stab in the dark and guess that this woman isn’t radfem.
She is spitting facts here. That's all that matters.
We need to embrace women who are standing up to this ideology. It's important not to search them through and through to determine whether or not they can sit with us. The smaller we make the inclusion criteria for "radfem", the fewer followers we will have- and the more we will push potential allies away.
.png)
I get how she could be misunderstood but she is telling women that we have somehow been brainwashed to pay scrotes get the chance to have terrible sex with us and then they don't even have to come to a full stop before they roll us out into the streets lol.
All in the name of so-called equality.
Part of feminism has been twisted for male benefit. When some of us noticed we were more than ever sad, single, used and losing, we knew this wasn't the answer and took a step back. But we still have women trying to be "equals" while hating it because we are still being treated with disrespect ..and now we have to even pay for the privilege.
She is telling women to be responsible for her part. Not paying, letting him open doors and expecting a gentleman doesn't make you not a feminist. Even if the 50/50, "equal rights=equal lefts" bros tantrum about it.
It is to the advantage of lazy, shitty men that society pretends that everyone has reached true equality and ignores history.
"But you owe him sex if he pays for anything for you" That is a shitty way of thinking and men don't think they owe you a relationship if you clean and cook for them either.
From this small snippet, it sounds like she’s blaming women and feminism for stingy scrotes who don’t pay for dinner dates. Fail.
100% facts