Men know what rape is

I recently read a pathetic reddit comment that assumed that men didn't know what rape was. A woman described a moment that stuck with me how fucking pathetic rape sympathizers are.

She said that her husband had a interaction with a coworker that exposed his "lack of education about rape🤡". The male coworker asked her husband if he had ever "dead-fished a woman." And how it's "great that she can't even say no to it."

Notice the language here. Dead and fish. We all know the connotations of that. Why are you aroused by an unmovable human who is mentally not present?

The husband was grossed out (apparently) and said to the friend that "that's rape, Kyle," in """surprised""" tone as if kYlE isn't a sentient being. As if Kyle wouldn't get trauma from being raped. As if Kyle isn't a male human, who evolved along females, who knows on a biological level that a physically sexual boundary that is crossed causes an extreme and deep lasting TRAUMA RESPONSE. KYLE pretends as if he isn't apart of our species. Kyle would fight back/dissociate/cry if he was in the process of being raped.

If he just wanted to get off, why didn't he masturbate? Why was he still hard in a woman who can't move or consent? Why is he sexually aroused by the thought of a woman being UNABLE TO SAY NO? Why is he attracted to the absence of the self-determination and protection of the female's self? Why is he sexually orgasming to violating a woman's sexual boundary?

I remember in the NINTH grade (im 21 now) that we watched a PATHETIC tea video that LITERALLY says in the description: " If you are STRUGGLING WITH CONSENT..." AS IF RAPISTS ARE VICTIMS. WHAT ARE THEY VICTIMS OF? MORALS??🤡

as if RAPE IS CONSENTING TO TEAAAA. IT IS NOT.

We watched this rape sympathizer video ( I didn't know what is was at first) that was talking about tea and how if someone doesn't want it don't give it. I had no idea as to why we were in health class watching this until at the end they mentioned rape.

I'm going to say it: this is all on purpose and misogynistic. I refuse to not recognize this attempt (it's already successful) by rapist psychopaths who understand the psychology of these individuals and are homosocial. They are obviously targeting rapists. But since they have no morals they will use this "struggling with consent" phrase as a dog-whistle to how their brains work so they can further manipulate poor women with sex trauma and/or are malleable that they "need sex" and that they're "sorry" about the last three-hundred times, and further and further the women fall into a mental black hole that they can't get out of, then some women become trauma bonded, sadomasochists, into strangulation BDSM and are addicted to being degraded.

It's funny that they grouped us girls in the room because WHO THE FUCK IS RAPING??? NOT ME! My friend Nina and Megan aren't going to rape me! I can sleep peacefully over at their house! But for some reason, my mother told me to not sleep over there IF THERE ARE BOYS. Why? She also had to furiously vet the husband, to which of COURSE SHE HAD TO. HE IS A MAN.

I literally said at the end of the video out loud "it's obvious not to do that." But what I didn't know, was that it wasn't ME being targeted. IT WAS THE BOYS in the room.

I apologize for offending any of you women here with what I say, because I know you would love a man, and there is nothing wrong with wanting a wonderful romantic life, but there is a reason why human females and other animals have a hidden estrus. I like how evolutionary biologists say that its ""paternal investment"" well by that logic WOMEN would EN MASSE KILL RAPISTS because of their shitty worthless genes, fucking up the gene pool. It's not because they wanted males to help them in raising, because the males will just rape the daughters. They are literally heads of all these patriarchal religions where they control women and girls en masse. You know how JW's cover up the sexual abuse? It isn't because they need to vet against ALL THE RAPISTS AROUND THEM. It is because biologically speaking MOTHER NATURE KNOWS that rape genes are fucking worthless and it is for self protection. IT is Eugenics, and we as a human species lose absolutely NOTHING by not having these freak genes running through our veins, and fucking up our brains.

I truly believe it is because women were just getting raped too fucking much and that their bodies where just in so much fucking stress that they just hid their fucking display that they are ready to mate. Yet, males, are unable to tell when women are fertile; surely if it is biologically for the women to vet males, males would be extremely invested (in response hormonally) to the female's need of child rearing. But what happens?

Oh, men play videogames when she's giving birth, they still do most of the child work, they're still not getting sexually satisfied, they can't trust their daughters even with their own father, they're still sold at the age of eight to be wife, they're still coerced into sex by their boyfriends who just need to "decompress."

Single women who want another person for their daughter risk their child being raped by their boyfriend.

There was an article I read that women and girls in the ME were burned alive for refusing to be sex slaves.

Hiding a woman's fertility period, I believe was for safety, because it literally only benefits the female. It is female centered. Evolution to prevent something from happening or leading TO something is almost always for PROTECTION.

The male does not respond to being present and for the children, there is no hormonal opposite of being more involved for the women, because if that were the case, why is it so dangerous for pregnant women to be around their spouses. Why? If it is for the benefit of all, the woman, the male being with the woman and the children having two parents present would be seen as normal. You could see that men that abuse their pregnant wives/gfs would have a hormonal imbalance, not just a personality disorder.

There is a evolutionary biological incentive of being able to asexually reproduce, it's called parthenogenesis. IF this ability (it's impossible now I think) was worthless like a skin tag, why the fuck is it still fucking here? AND WHY does it even try it's best to execute itself, which usually causes tumors or spontaneously just aborts itself.

I'm sorry but I have just been down the radfem hole and I just can't be blind anymore; I've just discovered it like fucking months ago.

Any pathetic, sadomasochistic liberal feminist🤡 who tells anyone that men need to learn how to not rape just admitted that:

-men have no morals and are just sperm banks, so why have one?

-men are not biologically human, because humans have evolved to recognize rape as a threat and develop trauma as a result. By this logic, males would not be traumatized by sexual assault and not have any negative response because it's not in their nature that rape is bad. So, if they are not biologically capable of recognizing rape as traumatic, why do females see it as so? Why are we statistically less likely to rape and molest? Why are we able to already know, innately that rape is awful? Why do we have sexual boundaries? Why are these here?

-men are not evolved enough as women are when it comes morals.

OR

-men are human, men know what rape is, it's just because of evolution, the egos meshed together with their hormonal profile, and their constant desire to forcefully inseminate mixed in with their strength created a complex that the vast majority of males cannot escape. Sexual narcissism.

Men using women who are groomed to be codependent on men through male validation and the depression of their ego, to gaslight other women wary of strange men into thinking that rape is "just as bad for the rapist too!!11!" and that "he didn't know better!!" is the best, most clever and psychopathic biological psyop towards women from any male in any species. Instead of them doing their "mating dance" they will send a woman to do it in front of you, distracting you so they can surprise rape you from behind.

They will do anything to gain access to women.

The women who lie to every woman that men just "don't know" or aren't educated, literally just admitted that women are moral and men are not.

The pickme handmaidens that are getting slammed against a headboard, while their eyes roll to the back of their head that's turning blue because they are being cut off from oxygen, simply have sexualized males violent nature towards females, because since birth they have been groomed that they will be with a man.

These women have also been told not to bend over exposing their ass SINCE THEY WERE A CHILD because MEN will rape you.

Why do other female animals avoid males all the fucking time? I remember watching an elephant docu, and in it, it showcased that ANY male trying to force themselves onto other female is immediately kicked out. And you know what that made me think?

Why do you think you are groomed since you a baby that you will be with a man? Are you sure it's because males love females? Or is it because now that egos have meshed with our hormonal and animal biology, that they can just manipulate you in a different way to force you to carry their child. Haven't you noticed in alot of cultures they always say, "I'm carrying his child," or "this is your baby, I'm doing all this for you, I'm carrying your kid," "I went off on IUD to carry his child." Why do they need to socialize us to have ownership over us and the children. Why do you think culturally they get the male last name?

Why do you think transbians exist on a biological level? Being born a homosexual you already deny men access without saying anything. Lesbians right now are being raped, all around the world to "correct" their sexuality. You have straight men, pedophilic men who will be paid to rape a girl who told her mother: "hey I like girls instead of boys", transbians, liberal men coercing lesbians to sleep with transbians, men who will say "you haven't had the right male yet," women who were raised by males force lesbians to recant their biology and accept rape culture and get raped, lesbians who are going through internalized lesbophobia hate seeing women together. Who does this center in the end? Men.

Here is a study that shows women are more sensitive to punishment rather than reward and the reverse is for males: https://bmcneurosci.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12868-021-00618-3

I know culture might affect this especially with gender bullshit, but I am not surprised they'd just have it easily attached to them. You've always seen women go through intense self work, to the point that they will die either for women's rights or lesbian rights and yet, men do not have the same response to injustice to well, what? Where are men oppressed? But, why not be altruistic? Why can't they be just not narcissistic?

Religion is reward based and who created it? Males. Why be altruistic selflessly, when you can be a Machiavellian altruistic human and score social points with women?

I remember many women posting about how even men can APPEAR to be HV and some years down the road all hell breaks loose. It's the same thing happening here. They mimic what is culturally considered female to gain access to them. They don't even have to get them pregnant, it's sometimes not about that. Every man who rapes, KNOWS what they are doing. They like to traumatize. Some men, don't humanize the female and just use her as a fleshlight, yet, subconsciously a fleshlight isn't enough.

They humanize enough to traumatize.

Pathetic women also sympathize with men who have personality disorders🤡.

Getting picked and getting that male validation is more important than being safe. And it's so funny. While they are sexualizing their abuse, their body is responding differently to the point parthenogenesis is being attempted.

If men are protectors, why aren't they immediately killing rapists to avoid any future children or women being potential victims? Why aren't they pouring more money into CRISPR gene editing to remove rape genes? Why are child molesters who mostly molest girls, not killed, or forcefully castrated? Why are men sympathizing with female violators if it is their nature to protect women🤡?

If men are raised this way, WHO THE FUCK RAISED THEM? Women can't be sadomasochistic, if they were never abused before.

And if they are socialized, then why do they have the genetics, for the emotions, tendencies and traits, present in the ideologies for it to ground itself to?

Why is it targeted to men?

Where did they get it?🤡🤡

Why would they want it?

Are we both human, or am I prey?

And if I am prey, who the hell is my predator?

It really hurts thinking this because it goes against our socialization as women. I get it, I have the same feelings you're feeling right now. But, I'm also extremely fucking irate. And you know what's funny, I still would never kill men. I just want to be left alone.

All the women in my ancestral past, who were raped as girls, all their anger, all their resentment and mental pain passed down and are in me, and it is not at the same, or even CLOSE of a level that men hate women. I am so astonished at my still present humanization of males. I am now only going to center women and girls, give my energy to women and only support women. I cannot for the life of me, ever waste energy onto men. I will only volunteer at women's shelters, women's anything, I am only supporting women and girls. I will only care for women. I can only love women.