.png)
This picture is not from his OLD profile. I found this picture on his work-related social media. So it is very public.
The ring is on his left hand, since the picture is a mirror selfie.
For Americans, ring on left ring finger definitely means wedding ring.
But he is European, and I know Europeans often wear wedding rings on their right hands.
Anyway, I think he’s married. What do you think?
UPDATE:
Thanks for your input, ladies. Obviously, the scrote has been blocked and deleted.
This is a reminder (for me, at least) to do your due diligence. I found the above picture not on his OLD profile but on his work Twitter (X) account. It was public, but I had to look for it. There was no indication on his OLD profile that he was married, engaged, divorced, separated, in a relationship, etc.
Never assume a man you meet IRL or on OLD is single! Too many scrotes are looking for sidepieces.
I'm European and in my experience the only rings worn on the ring finger on either hand here (especially by men) are wedding and engagement rings (usually wedding ring on the right hand and engagement ring (obviously almost always by women) on the left during the engagement and it moves to the right or another finger after the wedding. At least that's how I know it).
So chances are high that he is/was married.
And if not: what possible reason could a single man looking for a serious relationship have to wear a ring on that exact finger? He must know that it could be mistaken for a wedding ring.
I don’t know of any man who casually wears a ring like that on their ring finger, either hand.
The only time I’ve seen a casual ring on a ring finger, it’s been a big school ring or something. Not a band like that.
That could be his right hand actually … but yes considering finger it’s on it’s either engagement or wedding ring
Looks like a wedding band to me but I am no expert.
This isn't OLD but Im going to give an OLD example. Whenever men post pix with women, it looks like they are taken. Why would you post a phot/wear a ring like that unless you are trying to imply the obvious?