Edit- please look up “hybrid masculinity”. Esp the wiki. It explains what I’m feeling the best.
I don’t know that I’ve seen this covered on FDS. I’ve met a man who considers himself non-binary (uses they/them) and it is bugging me.
I am ambivalent when women, gay men, and even asexual men identify in this way, but it was bugging me that a cishet man identified this way. I thought about it and realized that it was because while I am in favor of a man rejecting parts of masculinity expectations that are unhealthy (ie hypermasculinity) and redefining masculinity for himself, to declare himself “not a man” feels disingenuous to me because 1) he is still enjoying the societal privileges of being a cishet man bc he presents as one and 2) it ignores the very real privilege his male body has over my female body in a sexual relationship (stronger, bigger, lower risk on symptomatic STDs, can’t get pregnant, almost always orgasms, doesn’t oxytocin bond as strongly, intense male sexual desire before I even know a guy that can be overwhelming and anxiety-inducing, etc etc).
To reject traditional masculinity is one thing- wear a skirt and eyeliner and an ombré if you want, idgaf- but rejecting the fact that he is a man altogether feels like it takes away the acknowledgment of the very real biological and societal power he has over me, like it’s falsely balancing the scales and concealing that imbalance, by merely changing up words in order to manufacture oppression. I’m probably not articulating this well, but that’s the best my tired mind can put this thing I can’t get *off* of it.
This all sort of crystallized for me when I read a wiki on a term I had never heard- hybrid masculinity. It is when men will benefit from the recognition of alternative forms of masculinities which makes more *men* feel validated, but they still largely ignore the larger gender institutions (which they still benefit from) that sustain gender inequality.
I can’t seem to post a link for “hybrid masculinity” but just google it, you’ll see a wiki and a decent article from everydaysociologyblog.com .
Maybe I don’t understand the expression of NB in men? Any thoughts here? Fwiw this is a sweet guy I’m referring to, haven’t had any problems, but I had these unsettling feelings surfacing about the NB thing. Thanks.
Edit: this also feels tricky because to express these things leaves me open to criticism that I am not progressive enough what with not being down with someone‘s gender identity, even if I clarify that these feelings of the concealment of the real power dynamic stem from me being only uncomfortable with it when it comes to men who are interested in sex with women.
Anyone trying to “identify” their way out of a privileged position into a historically oppressed class is a complete clown, in my opinion. Your instincts are correct. He is extremely sus.
I don’t care what clothes they wear or how they identify, I don’t trust male-bodied people. They are always going to come out with an innovative new way to present themselves as non-threatening, and push a narrative that certain men are safe and women can be dangerous too. Regardless of sex or gender identity, women don’t, and shouldn’t, need an excuse to distrust anyone, and we shouldn’t be silenced or drowned out when trying to explain which men can be trusted in which circumstances.
Men or anyone who identifies this way is a complete clown and is confused, and it's definitely a red flag...however I see you used the cringy term "cishet" which is another problem by itself, the majority of normal people subscribing to the terminologies of a bunch delusional people less than 1% is pretty problematic, not to mention it's an offensive language and I explained why in a previous comment of mine..y'all need to stop with this damn language ffs
In theory I agree but I would be wary of men using the label to force their way into spaces where their presence and opinions would not normally be welcome.
If somebody wants to be called they/them, im not gonna be a dick ..I'll do it. But imo, I believe NB just enforces gender roles. And the women that still present themselves extremely femininely but insist on being called he/they blow my minds the most . You can't ID yourself out of oppression and simply calling yourself a man doesn't give you any privileges. And calling yourself genderfluid and wearing a skirt doesn't stop you from receiving male privileges (looking at freaking Ezra Miller 🙄🙄)
Different, but makes me think of when men 'identify' as 'feminists' ... (yes I know, 'not all men'...)
Please get the penis owner out of here
This is like that "not like other girls" phase many of us go through, taken to another level.
"Not like other boys." 😆
Anyone using those terms are sus in general. You couldn't identify out of womanhood or manhood even if you wanted to.
I have non-binary friends, many of whom do acknowledge the concept of "passing privilege" and even admit it when they do have it. I guess the problem with this particular person is that they are not acknowledging it and that bothers you. Also, it's completely okay to not be attracted to people who wear eyeliners and skirts. You can't change the way you are wired. Like I said, I have NB friends but I won't date NB peeps. I'm a straight cis woman who is very picky about what kind of man she likes. It doesn't mean I don't think you are *the specific gender you are subscribing to*. It's just that your gender expression isn't attractive me. This obviously applies to not just NB peeps but also those who are cishet.
I think you will enjoy this article https://thecritic.co.uk/cool-your-heels/
I have some friends like this. I believe it involves social alienation, they are feminist and do not identify or feel belonging to men as a class except superficially. They do not deny that they physically appear the same and even believe it’s is futile to try to alter their appearance strongly to communicate their identity because they will never be taken seriously by straight people. They seem to live more happily carving out their own path that does not pay mind to gender roles and they do not subscribe to male ideology. The NB friends I have are uninterested in women romantically and date gay men. I would say they are socially similar to me.
It’s okay for “women”, “gay men”, and even “asexual men” to identify as non-binary, but it’s not okay for people you misgender as straight men to identify as non-binary? I don’t understand TERFs. They are not participating in society as a man, so no, they’re not benefiting from gender institutions that benefit men. If they openly identify as they/them, they are making themselves vulnerable to discrimination. It doesn’t matter then if they’re interested in having sex with women. Plenty of people have sex with women, and not all of them are other men. That has nothing to do with patriarchal oppression. In this scenario, they are not the ones “manufacturing oppression” — you are. You are making yourself the victim because of how they identify and it has absolutely nothing to do with you.