.png)
I'm curious to hear your thoughts.
Do you think women would eventually operate from a domination matrix/mentality, too? Or do you think the world and geopolitics, would look very different?
Please do not use this thread to create division during this sensitive time. We are here for the interests of Women and Female benefit.
Forum guidelines:
3. No Trolling or Advocating Violence
9. Be Civil
Disagreements are allowed, but attacking other members is not.
10. No Race-baiting, racism, ethnocentricism. No racist, ethnic, homophobic or transphobic slurs.
So: If Women were 'In Charge', what do you see/imagine/envision?
Personally, I lean towards diplomacy over violence, and I think it takes much more skill, & strength than brute force. I think women in genreral lean towards diplomacy over violence.
I'd love to hear your thoughts and perspectives.
There are definitely psycho women who would create war. But if the roles were reversed and women ran the world, there would be a lot less war, and violence and oppression in general. Males in general have violent impulses and a desire to dominate. Women in general simply lack those deficiencies.
Related: I believe that a woman needs to be severly mentally disturbed to commit murder (aside from self defense), but any average man is capable of murder, at least hypothetically, whether or not he's mentally ill.
No, because during the spartan days all the men left for war and with the women in charge crime dropped to 5%, Men are responsible for all crimes worldwide for 80%, women only 20%.
There were Queens who waged wars but they all had abusive fathers... oh wait I can't blame daddy, Only single mothers are to blame for unruly children..
No. There ARE matriarchal societies, and they basically do not have crimes. There's this myth that women having periods would make us implode everything - it's the opposite. In most mammal species where the main pods, troupes are female and children, there is very little violence until males show up to mate. You have a few examples in history of female leaders that absolutely skew the percentages with their personal violence that they NEEDED to have in order to be a female in power, but, by and large, female-led societies, businesses, families, etc, are less violent, pro-social, and less damaging to everything around them. Men hate that.
The only way we'd live in a truly non violent society is if there were no men. No men means no incentive for women to be violent, the pick mes would die out or evolve because a lot of what they do is pandering. A lot of women who mimic men in their thirst for power also do it to be validated by men. Erase men and you erase your problems.
Violent war as we know it (inhumane torture, sexual slavery, using dogs as suicide bombers, etc), maybe not. Women tend to handle things in different ways than men. We tend to communicate and don't resort to violence as easily.
Anecdotally, my dad's uni had female only and male only dormitories. The students came from lower income class background and usually never met anybody outside their own ethnicities before.
During my dad's 5 years studying there, there has been at least 2 in-campus ethnic "wars" where the male students tried to seriously kill each other (using knife and sharp objects, molotov cocktail, burning tires) caused by racial slurs. One of the wars was so bad the army had to come.
The female students, on the other hand, never had any violent disputes with each other. The worst "crimes" (thievery, racism) were handled solely by the dorm mother.
NO, because the nature of a female isn't to conquer things. That is the males nature, to conquer. This is why wars exist. Because of male nature. They conquer countries, and they conquer women.
Considering how much men sing about murdering each other I would say probably yea. Less / no men would very obviously lead to less violent conflict the world over
When I saw the Dalai Lama speak in 2008 he said women should run the world because we have a natural compassion that men do not have. He is right. No I do not think we would have wars.
Precious few and all would be started by men. Women need to form exclusive female only societies and orchestrate a secret take over of fundamental institutions, especially financial ones at the highest levels. We need to run everything. Men are too greedy and impulsive to manage and they have done badly so far. We can do better. I've no idea how. I hope someone else knows. We should be fed up letting men push us away from power.
there would be no wars. there wold be communities and collaboration. women are usually too busy taking care of other human beings, like children and he elderly, and keeping things organized in order to have quality of life. we can be violent and messy, sure. but compared to men we are perfection.
No but they would be a lot of screen shots